The Interfaith Journal on Religion, Art & Architecture
Volume 44, Issue 3: Editor’s Page

The Gift That Keeps Taking

Editor Mike Crosbie

I'm on the Buildings and Grounds Committee of my church. Recently an email from our committee chair let us know that a parishioner had come forward to donate an irrigation system for our memorial garden. The chair wanted the committee's feedback on the gift. “Sounds good to me” was the general reaction, so I felt like a wet blanket when I wrote back that I thought accepting this gift would be a mistake.Typically the offer of a gift from a parishioner is a no-brainer, especially during this time of tight budgets and the need to shave operating costs wherever a congregation can. But this one, for me, was a “brainer.” I expressed my concern that the gift seemed to ignore the fact that water resources are becoming more strained around the world. Our parish supports a poor church in Mozambique; how, I asked, could we accept the gift of a new irrigation system that would effectively make clean, drinkable water all the more precious for this very same church, albeit in the larger scheme of things? Shouldn't our decision about accepting this gift be contingent upon the features of the irrigation system? Is it one that conserves water? Might it draw most of its supply from collected rainwater, so that no potable water would be used for irrigation? What if we considered replacing the water-thirsty garden plants with drought-resistant varieties, effectively eliminating the need for this gift altogether? I even suggested we take the cost of the gift and donate that amount to an existing global fund to help provide potable water in places where it is still a rarity. Our rector quickly emailed back and informed everyone on the committee that this gift was not a monetary one, it was an irrigation system…take it or leave it.

Questions about the nature of gifts uncover the costs that congregations might have to pay for such generosity. Most congregations won't accept gifts without careful consideration of their esthetic impact, or the cost of upkeep, or a dozen other sensitive issues revolving around parish politics and history. Sustainability, I believe, should be high on the list of considerations about whether a gift should or should not be accepted. Green design, conservation, and earth stewardship are now important factors for many congregations in expressing their faith in community. But the link needs to be made real between what we espouse and how we act, even when we are offered a gift. It's an especially touchy decision: yes, we would welcome the chance to keep our garden beautiful, but at what cost? Does such a gift take more than it gives? What does the gift say about the congregation's ethics in terms of social responsibility and the just use of God-given resources?

If your congregation has a sustainability policy in place, does it cover the acceptance of gifts? Such a policy should not be defined by who is serving on the buildings and grounds committee; it should be discussed, adopted by the congregation as a whole, written down, and considered for every gift offered. If sustainability isn't deemed important in deciding whether or not to accept a gift, it should be. Bring it up to the leadership of your congregation for discussion and consideration. Be a wet blanket.

GREEN GUIDELINES FOR GIFTS TO THE CONGREGATION

These Guidelines for Gifts to the Congregation are intended to help all congregations of all faiths in consideration of acceptance of a gift (which often becomes part of the religious building's fabric of buildings and grounds). It is a series of questions that might be asked during the deliberations on accepting a gift to a faith community, and provide awareness of issues regarding the use of God's creation in the manufacture, maintenance, and disposal of a gift. Instead of a checklist, the guidelines are an aid for a gift to be considered with “an inquiring and discerning heart” to understand its impact on not only the faith community, but the world at large. The preface prayer below is from the Episcopal Church's Book of Common Prayer, but is appropriate for any faith community considering the acceptance of a gift:

“Almighty God, in giving us dominion over things on earth, you made us fellow workers in your creation: Give us wisdom and reverence so to use the resources of nature, that no one may suffer from our abuse of them, and that generations yet to come may continue to praise you for your bounty,” (BCP, 827).

Where did the gift come from?

Was the gift produced in a part of the world that uses child labor, unsafe labor practices, or working conditions that are environmentally hazardous? Could this gift be a product of such practices, which might be questionable to the faith community?

What is the gift made of?

Are there materials that might be toxic in content, that could off-gas in enclosed spaces and be a detriment to the church's indoor air quality? Is it made of non-renewable materials, those that require petrochemicals for manufacture, or materials that come from endangered species (animal or plant)? At the end of its useful life, can the gift be recycled, or is it made of recyclable materials so that it does not contribute to a landfill?

What will the gift consume?

Does the gift require the consumption of energy (fossil fuels or electricity), or dwindling natural resources such as potable water? If it is an appliance, does its energy consumption meet the guidelines of Energy Star appliances?

How will the gift be maintained?

Will the gift be durable, with little or no maintenance? Does the gift require the use of chemicals for its maintenance, which could be detrimental to those maintaining or using the gift (the clergy, laity), or detrimental to the indoor air quality of the religious buildings? Will the gift's maintenance require the use of endangered species or non-renewable resources to an unreasonable degree?

What does the gift say about the faith community?

Does the gift honor the intent to reduce consumption of God-given, non-renewable resources? Does it consume more energy or resources than is reasonable in a world where resources should be shared equitably?

Michael J. Crosbie is the Editor-in-Chief of Faith & Form and can be reached via
our contact form. This editorial is reprinted from Vol. 44, Issue 3 of Faith & Form magazine. Read previous editorials here.

Back to top